1
0
-1
1 answer
- 210
yup. currently, i think the subform work that way which requires a binder is set. The "Parent Store Binder" is used to store the subform value to it parent form (the form containing the subform) data table.
Add your comment...
yup. currently, i think the subform work that way which requires a binder is set. The "Parent Store Binder" is used to store the subform value to it parent form (the form containing the subform) data table.
Hi,
I have a form with a specific store shell binder. That form is included, as a subform, in several parent forms. Unfortunately, the binder in the form is not invoked. The only way I found to solve the problem was to include the code in store binder of the subform item in each parent form, which is annoying.
I guess that the store binder of the subform item is taken precedence over the store binder of the contained form, but that was not the expected default behaviour. That would be the behaviour expected when the "Parent Store Binder" is being chosen in the contained form.
Guys, what am I missing? Where is the mistake in my line of thoughts?